This is a descriptive article illustrating a multi-year research study in mathematics education of college students in the U.S. It focuses on the first two years in the undergraduate mathematics curriculum. The study presents the theory, practice, and results of an innovative instructional program (Keystone model) applied to algebra classes at the college. The research investigated two areas of student learning outcomes: performance in mathematics and improvements in students’ concentration skills. Under the application of this program, students not only achieved significant outcomes in mathematics, as evidenced by formative and summative assessments but also improved their concentration skills, as demonstrated in the gains in national reading comprehension tests.

In the following, we present, in extensive detail, the elements of the Keystone approach and its implementation in a learning environment, such as a college mathematics classroom.

Keystone model, concentration skills, formative and summative assessments, immediate and continuous feedback, development of mastery, structured cooperative learning, student engagement, reading improvement.

Received: May 25, 2023; Accepted: June 29, 2023; Published: August 5, 2023

How to cite this article: M. Vali Siadat, An assessment-directed, student-centered, and mastery-based model of teaching and learning in mathematics, Far East Journal of Mathematical Education 25 (2023), 1-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/0973563123012

This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References:
[1] C. Attard, Mathematics education in Australia: new decade, new opportunities? Engaging Maths, 2020. https://engagingmaths.com/2020/01/21/mathematics- education-in-australia-new-decade-new-opportunities/.
[2] R. L. Bangert-Drowns, J. A. Kulik and C. C. Kulik, Effects of frequent classroom testing, Journal of Educational Research 85(2) (1991), 89-99.
[3] J. E. Beagley and M. Capaldi, The effect of cumulative tests on the final exam, Primus: Problems, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies 26(9) (2016), 878-888.
[4] J. E. Beagley and M. Capaldi, Using cumulative homework in calculus classes, PRIMUS: Problems, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies 30(3) (2019), 1-10. doi:10.1080/10511970.2019.1588814.
[5] R. E. Bennett, Formative assessment: a critical review, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 18(1) (2011), 5-25.
[6] Berkeley Engineer Magazine (Spring), College of Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, Vol. 17, 2020.
[7] J. Bishop, The impact of curriculum-based external examinations on school priorities and student learning, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies at Cornell University, Working Paper 95-30, Ithaca, N.Y., 1995.
[8] A. Burazin, V. Jungić and M. Lovrić, Three countries, two continents: common challenges and opportunities in teaching first-year mathematics, Notices of the American Mathematical Society 67(1) (2020), 64-67.
[9] A. C. Butler, Multiple-choice testing in education: are the best practices for assessment also good for learning? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 7(3) (2018), 323-331.
[10] L. Cahill, B. Prins, M. Weber and J. L. McGaugh, -adrenergic activation and memory for emotional events, Nature 371 (1994), 702-704.
[11] L. Cahill, R. Babinski, H. J. Markowitsch and J. L. McGaugh, The amygdala and emotional memory, Nature 377 (1995), 295-296.
[12] Center for Analysis of Post-Secondary Readiness (CAPR), October 13, 2020.
[13] D. Clark, Plan B. Roediger and Karpicke-Retrieval practice and effortful learning, October 3, 2021. http://donaldclarkplanb.blogspot.com.
[14] F. M. Cornford, The Republic of Plato, Oxford University Press, New York and London, 1945.
[15] N. Davidson, ed., Cooperative Learning in Mathematics: A Handbook for Teachers, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA, 1990.
[16] F. N. Dempster, Using tests to promote learning: a neglected classroom resource, Journal of Research and Development in Education 25(4) (1992), 213-217.
[17] Education G.P.S., OECD, 2021. https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile? primaryCountry=AUS&treshold=10&topic=PI.
[18] H. C. Foyle and G. D. Bailey, Homework: its real purpose, The Clearing House 60(4) (1986), 187-188.
[19] H. C. Foyle and L. Lyman, Homework: research, policy, and implementation, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Orlando, FL, ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED303919, 1989.
[20] D. Gokcora and D. DePaulo, Frequent quizzes and student improvement of reading: a pilot study in a community college setting, SAGE Open 8(2) (2018), 9 pp. doi:10.1177/2158244018782580.
[21] M. Gold, Grades, Memo to the Faculty Series, No. 18, Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1966.
[22] F. S. Halley, R. L. Kotesky, J. M. Swanson and R. J. Tracy, Computer applications in teaching and learning, Paper presented at the Rochester Area Colleges’ Workshop on the Use of Computers in Instruction, Rochester, NY, ERIC Reproduction Services No. ED093389, 1973.
[23] D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research, Interaction Book Company, Edina, MN, 1989.
[24] J. D. Karpicke, A. C. Butler and H. L. Roediger III, Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practice retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 17(4) (2009), 471-479.
[25] T. Z. Keith, Time spent on homework and high school grades: a large-sample path analysis, Journal of Educational Psychology 74(2) (1982), 248-253.
[26] L. J. Kleinsmith and S. Kaplan, Paired-associate learning as a function of arousal and interpolated interval, Journal of Experimental Psychology 65(2) (1963), 190-193.
[27] L. J. Kleinsmith and S. Kaplan, Interaction of arousal and recall in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(2) (1964), 124-126.
[28] T. Lovelace, Brown Center Report on American Education, 2017.
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-2017-brown-center-report-on-american-education/.
[29] V. T. Mawhinney, D. E. Bostow, D. R. Laws, G. L. Blumenfeld and B. L. Hopkins, A comparison of students studying behavior produced by daily, weekly, and three-week testing schedules, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 4 (1971), 257-264.
[30] W. L. Nahial, L. S. Lomibao and C. A. Luna, The effect of daily-time pressured test with scaffoldings on students’ achievement and problem solving test scores as a mark of fluid intelligence, International Journal of Science and Research 6(10) (2017), 1798-1801.
[31] R. J. Nungester and P. C. Duchastel, Testing versus review: effects on retention, Journal of Educational Psychology 74(1) (1982), 18-22.
[32] R. A. Paschal, T. Weinstein and H. J. Walberg, The effects of homework on learning: a quantitative synthesis, Journal of Educational Research 78(2) (1984), 97-104.
[33] M. A. Pyc and K. A. Rawson, Why testing improves memory: mediator effectiveness hypothesis, Science 330 (2010), 335. doi:10.1126/science.1191465.
[34] H. L. Roediger III and J. D. Karpicke, Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention, Psychological Science 17(3) (2006), 249-255.
[35] Y. Sagher, M. V. Siadat and L. S. Hagedorn, Building study skills in a college mathematics classroom, The Journal of General Education 49(2) (2000), 132-155.
[36] Z. Schrank, An assessment of student perceptions and responses to frequent low-stakes testing in introductory sociology classes, Teaching Sociology 44(2) (2016), 118-127.
[37] S. Sharan, ed., Cooperative Learning: Theory and Research, Praeger Press, New York, 1990.
[38] M. V. Siadat, E. Peterson, C. Oseledets, M. J. Wang and G. Q. Zhang, The Keystone approach: integration of methodology and technology, MathAmatyc Educator 3(3) (2012), 46-57.
[39] M. V. Siadat, P. M. Musial and Y. Sagher, Keystone method: a learning paradigm in mathematics, Problems, Resources and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies 8(4) (2008), 337-348.
[40] R. E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning, Longman, New York, 1983.
[41] R. E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, 1990.
[42] R. E. Slavin, Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice, Allyn and Bacon, Needham Heights, MA, 2nd ed., 1995.
[43] H. F. Spitzer, Studies in retention, Journal of Educational Psychology 30(9) (1939), 641-656.
[44] Waskito, Irzal, Rizky Ema Wulansari and Kyaw Zay Ya, The adventure of formative assessment with active feedback in the vocational learning: the empirical effect of increasing students’ achievement, Journal of Technical Education and Training 14(1) (2022), 54-62.
[45] E. Zachry Rutschow, Workshop on Understanding Success and Failure of Students in Developmental Mathematics, The National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine, March 2019.

Kindly explore our recently upgraded website to access comprehensive article details at: https://pphmjopenaccess.com/