Reviewers
|
Book & Monographs
|
Conference
|
Contact Us
SEARCH
|
My Profile
|
My Shopping Cart
|
Logout
Home
Publication Ethics
Open Access Policy
Guidelines
Journals
▼pphmjopenaccess.com▼
Engineering
Mathematics
Statistics
All Journals
Submit a Manuscript
Author Login
Author Registration
Forget Password
Journal Menu
Journal Home
Editorial Board
Guidelines for Authors
Indexing
Contents
Contents
Subscribe
Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement
Content
Volume 24 (2024)
Volume 24, Issue 2
Pg 109 - 236 (December 2024)
Volume 24, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 107 (June 2024)
Volume 23 (2023)
Volume 23, Issue 2
Pg 157 - 228 (December 2023)
Volume 23, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 156 (June 2023)
Volume 22 (2022)
Volume 22,
Pg 1 - 137 (December 2022)
Volume 21 (2022)
Volume 21,
Pg 1 - 58 (June 2022)
Volume 20 (2021)
Volume 20, Issue 2
Pg 77 - 172 (December 2021)
Volume 20, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 75 (June 2021)
Volume 19 (2020)
Volume 19, Issue 2
Pg 99 - 190 (December 2020)
Volume 19, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 97 (June 2020)
Volume 18 (2019)
Volume 18, Issue 2
Pg 1 - 88 (December 2019)
Volume 18, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 58 (June 2019)
Volume 17 (2018)
Volume 17, Issue 3 - 4
Pg 97 - 160 (December 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 2
Pg 47 - 96 (June 2018)
Volume 17, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 45 (March 2018)
Volume 16 (2017)
Volume 16, Issue 3 - 4
Pg 135 - 181 (December 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 2
Pg 77 - 134 (June 2017)
Volume 16, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 75 (March 2017)
Volume 15 (2016)
Volume 15, Issue 4
Pg 267 - 363 (December 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 3
Pg 183 - 266 (September 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 2
Pg 93 - 181 (June 2016)
Volume 15, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 91 (March 2016)
Volume 14 (2015)
Volume 14, Issue 2
Pg 77 - 155 (December 2015)
Volume 14, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 76 (September 2015)
Volume 13 (2015)
Volume 13, Issue 2
Pg 51 - 117 (June 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 50 (March 2015)
Volume 12 (2014)
Volume 12, Issue 2
Pg 85 - 159 (December 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 84 (September 2014)
Volume 11 (2014)
Volume 11, Issue 2
Pg 69 - 128 (June 2014)
Volume 11, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 68 (March 2014)
Volume 10 (2013)
Volume 10, Issue 2
Pg 73 - 137 (December 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 72 (September 2013)
Volume 9 (2013)
Volume 9, Issue 2
Pg 69 - 131 (June 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 68 (March 2013)
Volume 8 (2012)
Volume 8, Issue 2
Pg 75 - 133 (December 2012)
Volume 8, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 73 (September 2012)
Volume 7 (2012)
Volume 7, Issue 2
Pg 63 - 131 (June 2012)
Volume 7, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 62 (March 2012)
Volume 6 (2011)
Volume 6, Issue 2
Pg 105 - 162 (December 2011)
Volume 6, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 104 (September 2011)
Volume 5 (2011)
Volume 5, Issue 2
Pg 67 - 139 (June 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 66 (March 2011)
Volume 4 (2010)
Volume 4, Issue 2
Pg 57 - 128 (December 2010)
Volume 4, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 56 (September 2010)
Volume 3 (2010)
Volume 3, Issue 2
Pg 87 - 172 (June 2010)
Volume 3, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 86 (March 2010)
Volume 2 (2009)
Volume 2, Issue 2
Pg 81 - 172 (December 2009)
Volume 2, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 80 (September 2009)
Volume 1 (2009)
Volume 1, Issue 2
Pg 101 - 174 (June 2009)
Volume 1, Issue 1
Pg 1 - 100 (March 2009)
Categories
▼pphmjopenaccess.com▼
Engineering
Mathematics
Statistics
All Journals
International Journal of Numerical Methods and Applications
International Journal of Numerical Methods and Applications
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages 155 - 174 (June 2009)
ON WU AND SCHABACK’S ERROR BOUND
Lin-Tian Luh (Taiwan)
Abstract:
Radial basis functions are a very powerful tool in multivariate approximation since they are mesh free. In the theory of radial basis functions, the most frequently used error bounds are the one raised by Madych and Nelson in [5] and the one raised by Wu and Schaback in [7], especially the latter. It seems that Wu and Schaback’s error bound is five times more frequently used than that of Madych and Nelson’s. The reason is that Wu and Schaback’s space of approximated functions is much easier to understand, and their error bound is much easier to use. Unfortunately, this error bound contains crucial mistakes which will be pointed out in this paper. Moreover, the r.b.f. people have misunderstood its space of approximands for long. This will also be discussed in depth. These, to some extent, may be a blow to r.b.f. people. However, Madych and Nelson’s error bound is still very powerful because it is highly related to Sobolev spaces which contain solutions of many differential equations. Moreover, Wendland’s error bound in [6] may also be used. No error has been discovered in the two error bounds hitherto. However, one should be very careful when using Wendland’s error bound because, as pointed out explicitly by Wendland in page 204 of [6], Wendland’s algebraic-type error bound is to some extent based on Wu and Schaback’s error bound. All these discussions are based on the central idea of this paper, i.e., unsmooth function should be approximated by unsmooth function.
Keywords and phrases:
multivariate interpolation, Kriging function, multiquadrics, Gaussians, thin-plate splines.
Number of Downloads:
232 |
Number of Views:
508
Previous
P-ISSN: 0975-0452
Journal Stats
Publication count:
214
Citation count (Google Scholar):
356
h10-index (Google Scholar):
10
h-index (Google Scholar):
10
Downloads :
56346
Views:
158615
Downloads/publish articles:
263.3
Citations (Google Scholar)/publish articles:
1.66
This website is best viewed at 1024x768 or higher resolution with Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 or newer.