AN OBSERVATIONAL STUDY VERSUS A RANDOMIZED EXPERIMENT
Cause-and-effect conclusions cannot generally be made on the basis of an observational study, and that unlike with observational studies, cause-and-effect conclusions can generally be made on the basis of randomized experiments. These results are exhibited analyzing two famous medical investigations: one observational study and the other randomized experiment. This article may be used in teaching an introductory statistics course, because it contributes and supports the recommendations of The American Statistical Association Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education (GAISE) committee, which made six recommendations (Aliaga et al. [1]) and (Everson [3]) for teaching introductory statistics; and also, the 2016 GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee.
cause-and-effect conclusions, randomized experiment, observational study, GAISE.
Received: January 2, 2022; Accepted: February 8, 2022; Published: March 29, 2022
How to cite this article: David Sotres-Ramos, An observational study versus a randomized experiment, Far East Journal of Mathematical Education 22 (2022), 11-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.17654/0973563122004
This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References:
[1] M. Aliaga et al., Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education: College Report, Technical Report, American Statistical Association, 2010.[2] D. R. Appleton et al., Ignoring a covariate: an example of Simpson’s paradox, The American Statistician 50(4) (1996), 340-341.[3] M. Everson, GAISE 2015: New Report for a New Era, AMSTAT News, Vol. 456, 2015, 29 pp.[4] GAISE College Report ASA Revision Committee, Guidelines for Assessment and Instruction in Statistics Education College Report 2016. http://www.amstat.org/education/gaise.[5] H. J. Norton and G. Divine, Simpson’s paradox, and how to avoid it, Significance 12(4) (2015), 40-43.[6] E. H. Simpson, The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 13 (1951), 238-241.[7] Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group, Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing physicians’ health study, New England Journal of Medicine 321(3) (1989), 129-135.[8] J. Utts and R. F. Heckard, Mind on Statistics, 6th ed., Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia, 2021.[9] M. P. J. Vanderpump et al., The incidence of thyroid disorders in the community: a twenty-year follow-up of the Whickham survey, Clinical Endocrinology 43 (1995), 55-69.