Abstract: Purpose: The present study focuses on the job satisfaction (JS) and organizational commitment (OC) vis-à-vis doctors in Saudi Arabia. It is a cross-sectional study, and the instruments used for gauging the perceptions of the doctors for the study variables are organizational commitment questionnaire (OCQ) and job descriptive index (JDI). Data was collected from public hospitals located in six cities in Saudi Arabia. Inclusion/Exclusion criteria are established prior to the collection of data. The data was collected by students of the first semester studying in executive masters’ program HSAE 613 in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah as integral part of their learning outcomes for application of statistical tools in hospital administration. The selected dimensions of job satisfaction in the present study are: work, pay, promotion, supervision, and co-workers. Statistical software (SPSS) was used for eliciting the requisite information to address the research questions. The outcomes of the present study will supplement decision-making process of power be in healthcare provider institutions while dealing with psychological aspects that affect job satisfaction and organizational commitment of doctors in public hospitals in Saudi Arabia.
Design/methodology/approach
(a) The data collected and used are cross-sectional and quantitative in nature.
(b) It is a correlational research where the researcher cannot intervene in the research setting.
(c) Convenience sampling is used in the selection of respondents.
(d) Only doctors currently employed in public hospitals participated in the study. A total of 170 doctors from six cities in Saudi Arabia participated in the study. The measures used were job descriptive index (JDI) and organizational commitment questionnaire (OCQ).
Findings: The results showed that promotion has the highest impact on JS and OC. Also, JS is a highly significant predictor of OC.
Research limitations/implications
(a) The current study is restricted to only six cities, in Saudi Arabia, and only public hospitals are explored so the generalizability of the current study may to some extent is constrained.
(b) Gender disparity is witnessed as only 39% of the respondents were female doctors.
Originality/Value: Doctors are the first group to handle a medical contingency and throughout the Middle East are always in short supply, hence the raison d’etre emerges. Therefore, the healthcare organizations should have a proper insight into the JS and OC of doctors.
|
Keywords and phrases: job satisfaction, organizational commitment, doctors, dimensions, variation explained.
Received: December 3, 2021; Accepted: December 18, 2021; Published: January 11, 2022
How to cite this article: Abdullah M. Almarashi, Saud Al Wadei, Ahmed Suliman Alajaj, Ahmad Zogphee M. Alshoqiqe, Mahdi Naser Altherwi, Sami Habib Almubarak, Hussain Bin Howaij Alsulea, Hussam Abdulaziz Madkhali, Faisal Fahad Alnemari, Nhari Mohammed Malhan, Ahmed Faisal AlThaher, Ahmed A. Almurashi, Abdulalim Al Marashi and Khushnoor Khan, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment of doctors: a case study of Saudi Arabia, JP Journal of Biostatistics 19 (2022), 15-35. DOI: 10.17654/0973514322002
This Open Access Article is Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
References:
[1] Ahmed S. Al-Aameri, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment for nurses, Saudi Medical Journal 21(6) (2000), 531-535. [2] N. G. Alghamdi and K. Khan, Job satisfaction and organizational commitment of paramedics - a case study of Saudi Arabia, Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 15(4) (2018), 1283-1290. [3] T. Aldrees, S. Al-Eissa, M. Badri, A. Aljuhayman and M. Zamakhshary, Physician job satisfaction in Saudi Arabia: insights from a tertiary hospital survey, Annals of Saudi Medicine 35(3) (2015), 210-213. [4] A. M. Al-Rubaish, S. I. A. Rahim, M. S. Abumadini and L. Wosornu, Academic job satisfaction questionnaire: construction and validation in Saudi Arabia, Journal of Family and Community Medicine 18(1) (2011), 1. [5] D. W. Ariani, Leader-member exchanges as a mediator of the effect of job satisfaction on affective organizational commitment: an empirical test, International Journal of Management 29(1) (2012), 46-56. [6] B. Buchanan, Building organizational commitment: the socialization of managers in work organizations, Administrative Science Quarterly 19(4) (1974), 533-546. doi:10.2307/2391809. [7] J. B. DeConinck and C. D. Stilwell, Incorporating organizational justice, role states, pay satisfaction and supervisor satisfaction in a model of turnover intentions, Journal of Business Research 57 (2004), 225-231. [8] J. Fraenkel, N. Wallen and H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 10th ed., New York, McGraw Hill Companies, 2019. [9] F. Herzberg, B. Mausner and B. Snyderman, The Motivation to Work, 2nd ed., New York, John Wiley, 1959. [10] R. Knoop, Relationships among job involvement, job satisfaction and organizational commitment for nurses, J. Psychol. 29 (1995), 643-649. [11] B. Kuvaas, Performance appraisal satisfaction and employee outcomes: mediating and moderating roles of work motivation, International Journal of Human Resource Management 17(3) (2006), 504-522. [12] B. Mannheim, Y. Baruch and J. Tal, Alternative models for antecedents and outcomes of work centrality and job satisfaction of high-tech personnel, Human Relations 50(12) (1997), 1537-1562. [13] J. P. Meyer and N. J. Allen, A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment, Human Resource Management Review 1 (1991), 61. DOI: 10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z. [14] Richard T. Mowday, Richard M. Steers and Lyman W. Porter, The measurement of organizational commitment, Journal of Vocational Behavior 14 (1979), 224 247. [15] J. P. Meyer, D. J. Stanley, L. Herscovitch and L. Topolnytsky, Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: a meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences, Journal of Vocational Behavior 61 (2002), 20-52. [16] J. Nunnally, Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978. [17] A. Panaccio and C. Vandenberghe, Perceived organizational support, organizational commitment, and psychological well-being: a longitudinal study, Journal of Vocational Behavior 75 (2009), 224-236. [18] J. Price and C. Mueller, Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge, Mass: 1986. [19] P. E. Spector, Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: development of the job satisfaction survey, American Journal of Community Psychology 13(6) (1985), 693-713. [20] C. H. Jr. Schwepker, Ethical climate’s relationship to job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention in the sales force, Journal of Business Research 54(1) (2001), 39-52. [21] P. C. Smith, L. M. Kendall and C. L. Hulin, Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement, Rand McNally, Chicago, 1969. [22] L. H. Yiing and K. Z. Ahmad, The moderating effects of organizational culture on the relationships between leadership behavior and organizational commitment and between organizational commitment and job satisfaction and performance, Leadership and Organization Development Journal 30(1) (2009), 53-86. [23] D. A. Yousef, Organizational commitment: a mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non‐Western country, Journal of Managerial Psychology 15 (2000), 6-24.
|